-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
Update push and pull docs
#2685
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I like this improvement. It's a good step for more clarity.
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| If you **DON'T** want duplicate items, set the third parameter to `true`: | ||
| If you **DON'T** want duplicate values, set the third parameter to `true`: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I haven't checked the code, but this suggests that the boolean causes $addToSet to be used internally instead of $push. Is that correct?
Having a boolean argument control that rubs me the wrong way (I'll add it to the growing list), but I assume there's an explanation for this behavior. Is the push() method here actually derived from something else in Eloquent, or was it originally created in this library specifically for the MQL operators?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I haven't checked the code, but this suggests that the boolean causes
$addToSetto be used internally instead of$push. Is that correct?
Yes. It's the logged queries of pushing normally and pushing unique values.
array:2 [
0 => array:3 [
"query" => "users.updateMany({"_id":"65672f58551357588a07c993"},{"$push":{"items":{"$each":["boots"]}}},{"multiple":true})"
"bindings" => []
"time" => 1.82
]
1 => array:3 [
"query" => "users.updateMany({"_id":"65672f58551357588a07c993"},{"$addToSet":{"items":{"$each":["hat","jeans"]}}},{"multiple":true})"
"bindings" => []
"time" => 0.6
]
]
Having a boolean argument control that rubs me the wrong way (I'll add it to the growing list), but I assume there's an explanation for this behavior. Is the
push()method here actually derived from something else in Eloquent, or was it originally created in this library specifically for the MQL operators?
The push method is originally from Eloquent and it's used for saving a model instance and its relationships to the database. this library overrides the push method and accepts three args. If no arg is passed, the original push method will be called.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is Eloquent's push method documented anywhere beyond Recursively Saving Models & Relationships? That doesn't appear to take any arguments and the method seems entirely different in purpose (this doesn't have to do with relationships).
@GromNaN: A boolean flag to determine whether $push or $addToSet is used seems like a poor design as it makes the code less self-documenting. I think this is compounded by the fact that the method on the model class uses func_get_args() and doesn't define a named parameter that users could specify if they so desired.
It may be worth making a ticket to revisit this down the line. Perhaps introduce a new addToSet() method and then deprecate the original variation. This might also be a moot point when/if the query builder is integrated.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💯 agree that the double behavior of this method is a bad design.
If deprecate the custom behavior of Model::push with parameters, we have to do deprecate the pull method too.
Let's improve the documentation for now.
Co-Authored-By: Jeremy Mikola <[email protected]>
Co-Authored-By: Jeremy Mikola <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, so over to @GromNaN.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you @hans-thomas for the care taken with the documentation and for your kind review @jmikola
Fixes #2387,
Hello there, I updated the
pushandpullmethods documentation to solve the confusion about using these methods.